Indian Breeds
The history of ‘blood feud’ is that of
miscegenation, where breeding is the mixing of what are commonly understood to
be people of different racial backgrounds; the most easily recognizable being
that of black and white ancestral lineage. During the period of the ‘Indian
wars’ (1609-1890), in the United States of America, the various Indian nations
were described as ‘breeds’, for example, a ‘half-breed’ was someone with Indian
blood, after breeding between a ‘red Indian’ and a white European settler, for
example, as the continent, ‘discovered’ by Italian explorer Christopher
Columbus’ ships in 1492, came to be colonized. What isn’t usually perceived as
logical coherence is that the extinction of the bred is what they are for; to
the extinguisher.
In English history, the houses of both York
and Lancaster were made extinct, as a ‘breed’, in the 15th century,
with the execution of the Prince of Wales, Edward, at the battle of Tewkesbury
(1471), and the murder of Henry VI, subsequently incarcerated in the Tower of
London. A distant relation of Lancaster, Henry Tudor, becoming king, as Henry
VII, after the slaying of Richard III of York, last of his dynasty, at the
battle of Bosworth (1485), before resolving the conflict by marriage to
Elizabeth of York.
The jaundiced point of view is that’s what the
houses of Lancaster and York were for; being killed. The equivalent perspective
is of a people bred to build a civilization, which inheritance they are then
exterminated for. Although that’s paradoxically perceived as ‘normal’, in terms
of the aims of warfare, the only foreseeable end is human extinction. Although
there’s much speculation amongst palaeontologists about the fate of Central and
South American cultures like those of the Mayans, Aztecs, and Incas, none
suppose they were bred in order to be killed for what they had, whereas most
criminal activity presupposes that at its base. Pockets are for picking, which
is why trousers are made to wear, and is what trouser wearers are for.
That miscegeny is at the root is dependent on
a more radical interpretation of biblical texts than is usual, for example,
according to Jewish midrash, that is,
exegesis, the first man created by God, Adam, was a hermaphrodite, so the
creation of Eve from his side/rib, as recorded in the Torah and Talmud, which
is the history and law of the Jews, is a euphemism for self-fertilization. The
story of the angel, Satan, turned into a serpent by God, for giving Eve ‘the
fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil’, which it was ‘death to
taste’, after God had told them to ‘eat only of the fruit of the tree of life’,
which was immortality, then becomes a description of how the human species,
alienated from itself, became two distinct blood lines; the extinct and the
living.
The essential key to understanding is God’s
promise to Eve that her ‘seed’ will prevail, despite the pair’s expulsion from
the paradise of Eden, ‘You shall crush the head of the serpent with your foot
but he will bruise your heel.’ (Gen:
3. 15) Breeding the seed of Eve, that is, the hermaphroditic ‘futanarian’ (foot)
brainpower of her side of the human story will produce the technological level
of medical science to restore immortality to humanity, which necessarily means
the replacing of the serpent’s seed with women’s seed. As the male line is that
of the serpent, that is, Satan, the almost extinct lineage is that of Eve, with
the enforcing of gender assignment surgery (GAS) in the United States, for
example, upon newborn hermaphrodites, as that aspect of miscegeny promoting
human slavery; through the extinction of the more powerfully intellectual futa bloodline.
Although heterosexuality is an aspect of breeding
for men, homosexuals aren’t sexually interested in women other than as that
aspect of slavery, which suggests that’s what they’re for, while appealing to ‘the
one’, who accepts the enslaving homosexual perspective; if it preserves his
role as fertilizer. All others, who don’t qualify for the ‘stud farms’ of
homosexuality, are neutralized as drones, that is, fathers, sons, brothers, and
husbands, are ‘familied’; espousing homosexuality perforce. This is Satanism.
It’s probable that homosexuals kill people,
because they live too long, as memory is an aspect of brainpower that affords
people knowledge enough to continue without deferring to them. In that case the
anally transmitted ‘incurable killer disease’, HIV/AIDS, constitutes
homosexuality’s ‘biological weapon’, allied to its ‘conventional weapon’ of ‘familying’
heterosexuals, as drones invading other women’s ‘cunt trees’. Continuing to
stunt the growth of the ‘family tree’ of women’s seed into impotence and
ineffectuality by making sexual relationships outside of the marriage lethal
possibilities.
It’s probable also that Satanists in
homosexuality, that is, menhoods, time-travel, in order to care for themselves,
and oversee the deaths of their perforce ephemeral slaves. As people are taught
the Bible, that is, the Old Testament of the Jews, and the New Testament of the teacher, Jesus
‘Christ’, the Messiah, who gave his name to the religion of Christianity, which
believes the New Testament supersedes
the Old Testament, they accept death
at around ‘three score years and ten’ (70), because the Bible says so, and therefore can’t object to the Satanists killing
them to make it so; even if they knew.
The Bible
is then become a Satanical text supporting the serpent’s seed, despite Jesus’
plea to consanguinity, ‘Love your neighbour as you love yourself.’ (Mk: 12. 31) Taken to the hill of Calvary
outside the city of Jerusalem, during the period of the occupation of Palestine
by the Empire of Rome, in the reign of Tiberius Augustus (17-37 CE), where he
was nailed to a cross of wood and died there, Jesus experienced Resurrection
and Ascension to heaven, breaking the curse of death upon humankind, according
to the Christian church, since Eve and Adam’s expulsion from the paradise of
Eden, which means 70 years (Ps: 90.
10) is no longer a yardstick to measure life-expectancy, as people become more
aware of Satanism as their killer that ensures they remain slaves.
What’s bizarre, despite Satanism’s convoluted,
and obfuscating explications, is that Jesus was given over to the Jewish
Pharisees, that is, religious police, by the disciple, Judas, for being with a
woman without his permission. Jesus’ response led to his execution, ‘Leave her
alone.’ (Mk: 14. 6) That Jesus’
teaching is based on his understanding of women’s seed is evident from the
episode of his life’s history in which he says, after a woman is allegedly
caught in adultery, ‘Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.’ (John: 8. 7) As men are the adulterate of
women’s seed, it’s impossible to define women as adulterous.
That women are the victims of miscegeny is the
basis of an analysis of the function of racism, which is that peoples are bred
in order to dispossess them of their property, position, and wealth. The patriarch,
Abraham, whose son, Isaac, founded Judaism, while his second son, Ishmael, is
credited with being the founder of Islam, through his descendant, the Prophet
Mohamed, to whom the angels dictated the Koran
(610-30 CE), was vouchsafed a vision by God, ‘I will indeed bless you and make
your offspring as numerous as the stars of the sky and the sand on the
seashore.’ (Gen: 22.17) That women’s
seed breed exponentially, as hermaphrodites have all of the host wombs as well
as all of the semen, is the key to the colonization of the universe, although
the Satanist picture is the same. When the flocks of the congregations of the
Christian churches have been shepherded to the planets amongst the stars and
thereupon heaven is built, Satanism’s wolves descend and take from the sheep by
slaughter.
The Jews are represented as God’s ‘chosen
people’, throughout the Old Testament,
although it’s a choice fraught with ambiguity, ‘… start killing; do not show
pity or spare anyone. Slaughter the old men, the young men and maidens,
the women and children.’ (Ez: 9. 3-6) God’s slaughtering of the Jews in
Jerusalem is equalled in proportion only by God’s slaughter of other peoples,
which suggests that God’s unhappy with the results of the breeding program
interfered with by Satan. If, as seems likely, women’s seed is God, all breeds
are for extinction in Satanism, as Satanists want the serpent’s seed and
slavery.
When God drowned the Earth, because of its
peoples unspecified wickedness, which was possibly bestiality, the family of
Noah survived in the Ark he built, with a place in ‘the box’, that is, ship,
for a breeding pair of all of the animals of the Earth. As the term for
non-Jews is goyim, together with the
fact that all of the animals were non-Jews, suggests that these became goyim, that is, ‘game’ animals, and that
the game was for them to build heaven, before the Jews arrived to slaughter
them for whatever they could get, which is Judeo-Christianity in Satanism.
However, as a Jew can only be born from a Jewess, women are Jews, that is, as
women’s seed is Judaism, miscegeny is in fact, like adultery, impossible for
women, as they’re the humans, which is what God apparently wanted to be for.
The bugbear in the Christian myth is guilt.
Jesus is presented as sinless, which is why he was killed, as a human sacrifice
to the gods of ancient Rome, but also as an animal sacrifice to God, in Judaic
terms, as he had assumed goyim
status, that is, he was guilty of abandoning Judaism, while the people who
killed Jesus, or stood by and watched, while he was condemned, and executed by
the Roman judge, Pontius Pilate, were sinful, and therefore guilty. In this
sense guilt is similar to racism, where the sinful are guilty, and the sinless
are killed, which has become the spirit of Christianity, as business prefers
slavery to fairness.
Jesus’ goyim
are Christians, while the game with Jesus’ spy, Judas, was that Jesus didn’t
come, where come is a euphemism for fertilizing semen and orgasm, as he told
the Messiah that the ‘perfume’, that is, the woman, was ‘too expensive’. As the
oil she was anointing Jesus with was spikenard, Judas’ observation was his spy
canard, while Jesus’ disciple John’s prophetic vision of the future, Revelation, in predicting Jesus’ ‘Second
Coming’ to the Earth, as ‘he who will rule the nations with an iron sceptre’ (Rev: 2. 27), is for Satanism a challenge
to say that Jesus never came at all, which is homosexuality’s approach towards
heterosexuality, as a threat to their slave system, and likely has as its
teleology that women reproduce with each other, do all of the work, including
that of the intellect, and fight their battles too.
The Brutish Empire (1497-), legendarily
founded by Brute, a descendant of the survivors of the fall of the city of Troy,
as described by the Greek poet, Homer, in his Iliad (760-10 BCE), with what came to be the city of London, called
Trinovantum (New Troy),1 ruled by
emitting a never ending series of orders to people, for example, the Chinese,
the Indians of the subcontinent of Asia, and the Sudanese in West Africa, which
manifested as a form of hysteria, after Scot John Logie Baird’s success of his
prototype television set in 1926, corresponding
to Jesus’ disciple John’s revealing of ‘the beast’ of TV, ‘The second
beast was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that
the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be
killed.’ (Rev: 13. 15) War movies
perpetuating war.
Although George Orwell’s science fiction
social commentary novel, 1984 (1949),
posits ‘Big Brother’, as an aspect of his fictional state of IngSoc (English socialism),
with Britain, aligned with Oceania, and called ‘Airstrip One’, at war with
Eurasia and Eastasia by turns, the reality of closed circuit television (CCTV) observation,
with a nation of job applicants preparing for in-person or online ‘live’ video
interviews, as a governed substitute for actual employment, is its 21st
century hysterical form. Closely approximating to Orwell’s vision of a future
population expected to feel riddled with guilt, and constantly under pressure
to obey orders and instructions to ensure that they remain unkilled, as opposed
to the killed, who’re sinless in the sense that they don’t perceive their guilt
in being disobedient to their dictator, ‘… always there will be the
intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler.’2 The
actual spirit of Christianity is akin to that of racism, where the people are ‘innocent
until proven guilty’, in legal terms, and the goal of Orwell’s ‘Thought Police’
is to convict them - of thinking.
1 Cf.
Nennius, Historia Brittonum (The
History of the Britons), Chartres Municipal Library, Shelfmark 98, c. 900 CE.
2 Orwell, George Nineteen Eighty-Four, Secker & Warburg, 1949, Pt III, Ch. 3.
